XRay emitter device made from a barbecue lighter

Portable device that emits XRays when the trigger is pulled. No battery necessary. Can be used to safely test radiation detectors.

Similar projects worth following
This is a small device I made that fires a pulse of ~10 keV XRays when the trigger is pulled. It uses no external power source (all energy comes from pulling the trigger). The amount of radiation produced is tiny but detectable, making this is a good tool for testing radiation detectors with essentially no risk to the operator.See a demonstration of this device in action here: (Note that this is a disassembled version, as I broke the one displayed here and plan to rebuild it tomorrow)Update: I was recently able to test this device with a solid-state photodiode detector and was able to register radiation hits. Because both Geiger counters and photodiode detectors respond to this device (which operate on entirely different principles), I can now confidently say that it is producing X-rays rather than lowe

I've built (invented?) a small, lightweight device that emits an XRay pulse when you pull a trigger. No battery is necessary - all energy produced via XRay emission comes directly from the energy put into pulling the trigger. As far I know I'm the first person to do this with a lighter/piezoelectric, so that's cool!

The XRay pulses produced are short and relatively weak, but register on geiger counters. This makes the device probably the safest way possible to test a radiation detector, since radiation is only emitted on a trigger pull and the radiation pulse itself is not very strong. I'm not one to be paranoid about radioactive sources (the ones you can find are totally safe if not consumed), but this device is so safe that any radiation risk can effectively be ignored.


When sufficiently high voltage is applied across a vacuum tube, electrons can tunnel out of one of the terminals and accelerate across the tube, arriving with a kinetic energy of 1 electronvolt (eV) per volt crossed by the electron. Upon arriving at the positive terminal, the electrons smash into the metal, producing braking radiation. All charges emit electromagnetic radiation when they are accelerated, so when a very fast electron collides with a metal target, very high energy photons can be produced (up to the kinetic energy of the electron itself).

This means that running high voltage across a vacuum tube will produce XRay photons, with a broad spectrum (ending at the maximum kinetic energy corresponding to the voltage across the tube).

While testing some 6J1 rectifier vacuum tubes I've had for awhile for XRay production (using a 20000 Volt CRT TV derived power supply) I remembered that barbecue lighters produce very low energy high voltage pulses. When you pull the trigger on a lighter, a small piston strikes a piezoelectric crystal, producing a very high voltage across the crystal. Hooking up a modified lighter (no gas feed lines, electrical leads exposed) to the 6J1 tube produces small, harmless pulses of XRays I was able to pick up on my geiger counter (CDV-700 as well as a SBM-20 based Ukrainian counter). 


I was confused to find that after 5-10 XRay pulses using the lighter, the tube would stop working and no more XRays would be produced. Taking off the tube I found that the lighter wouldn't even consistently produce high voltage arcs anymore. 

My idea (which turned out to be correct) is that the vacuum tube is acting as a high-voltage capacitor, which is charged up by the piezoelectric crystal's initial high voltage pulse. This capacitor is mostly discharged by the electrons accelerating into the target and producing XRays, but eventually the voltage drops to a point where less electrons are able to tunnel out. By now the piezoelectric crystal is totally discharged, causing current to flow back from the capacitor (vacuum tube) through the crystal, permanently damaging it.

Adding a semiconductor diode in series with the positive terminal of the piezoelectric crystal to prevent current from flowing back into the crystal solves this issue. Not just any diode will work, though. For example, I originally tried a 1N4001 diode as I had a ton of them lying around. After soldering it up I realized that with a maximum reverse voltage of just 50 volts, this diode would probably fail, with the charged up tube punching right through it to destroy the crystal. I tested it anyway and sure enough, the lighter was damaged and had to be thrown away.


All in all it took 5 destroyed lighters to find a working solution. I ended up using a huge diode salvaged from a microwave oven last year. These diodes form part of the voltage multiplier that steps up high voltage to feed into the magnetron microwave transmitter, and can withstand up to 15000 volts of reverse voltage before breaking down. This is well above the piezoelectric crystal's...

Read more »

JPEG Image - 2.22 MB - 05/10/2018 at 04:18


JPEG Image - 1.72 MB - 05/10/2018 at 04:18


JPEG Image - 1.98 MB - 05/10/2018 at 04:18


JPEG Image - 1.85 MB - 05/10/2018 at 04:18


  • 1 × Piezoelectric Barbecue Lighter Preferably with gas lines removed
  • 1 × High-Voltage Microwave Oven Diode Required to prevent lighter from being killed by its own high voltage discharge
  • 1 × Vacuum Tube Rectifier I used a 6J1 Tube

  • 1
    Step 1

    Wire the filament of the rectifier tube to the negative output of the piezoelectric crystal. 

  • 2
    Wire the top plate of the tube to the negative terminal of the microwave diode, then wire the positive terminal of the diode to the positive output of the piezoelectric crystal.
  • 3
    Pull the trigger and watch your radiation detectors click.

View all 3 instructions

Enjoy this project?



Vxh wrote 04/21/2023 at 13:29 point

Hello I tried the setup and my geiger gmc-300e picks up pulses when I press the piezo, but this happens as well when the tube is not connected, hence I am not sure if it picks RF interference or actual X-rays.. did you try your setup next to the geiger without the tube connected?

  Are you sure? yes | no

cbed07472 wrote 07/18/2021 at 19:58 point

Could a c7 lightbulb replace the vacuum tube? I saw a video on YouTube showing a person creating X-rays with the lightbulb.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Martin wrote 06/11/2019 at 10:50 point

Instead of the blocking diode I think a high value discharge resistor should also avoid the damage of the crystal. I would target the discharge time constant somewhere between 10ms and 100ms. Die you make experiments in this direction?

  Are you sure? yes | no

GH wrote 06/13/2019 at 05:32 point

I did not attempt this, but I do like the idea. I could see an issue with the resistor required to save the crystal being low enough resistance to prevent the crystal from arcing across the tube, but these lighters are so cheap that testing it probably isn't an issue.

I might try this out if I ever remake this device. Let me know if you end up trying it.

  Are you sure? yes | no

greenaum wrote 04/19/2020 at 17:46 point

As you say, there's almost no current. At tens of kilovolts, all resistances look small! You might have 2 resistors in series, sticking out away from the pins, hanging in the air. So they're not presenting a shorter path than the existing air between the pins anyway. You could perhaps put a bit of plastic in as extra insulation.

Similarly, you could build a resistive divider, maybe 1000:1 ratio, which would let you measure the voltage across the tube with an ordinary meter, so you could see the effect and how fast it discharges. As well as measure the voltage, which I'd be curious about.

Actually maybe make it 100,000:1 to start with, and use a cheap meter!

Anyway, it's still a nifty device. Like a missing invention from the Victorian era! I'm not sure if they had barbecues but I'm sure they had piezoelectricity eventually. They could have used a quartz crystal in a mousetrap! I can imagine some dusty box somewhere with a load of primitive X-rays of mouse's legs, taken like this on glass plates.

  Are you sure? yes | no

GH wrote 05/17/2018 at 21:09 point

I wouldn't worry, the x-ray dosages acquired by using this device are incredibly insignificant. The amount of x-rays detected with the tube right on the geiger counter are roughly equivalent to the dose obtained from a single background radiation hit, of which there are 10-20 per minute. 

Constantly pressing the button with the tube pressed against the skin might be able to come somewhat close to the dosage acquired from holding a weak radioactive source like uranium ore. I'm willing to bet that a single dental X-ray irradiates you with more dose than this thing could produce over a month of pulling the trigger. 

  Are you sure? yes | no

David H Haffner Sr wrote 05/17/2018 at 20:08 point

I must tell U that this is a very dangerous project which poses a serious risk to UR health from exposure to X-rays...U should be emphasizing those risks in UR description.

Also I want to add that X-rays are cumulative...albeit perhaps at those weak levels it may take longer but they accumulate in the calcium deposits of UR body...UR bones, so please do not take it so lightly :)

  Are you sure? yes | no

Similar Projects

Does this project spark your interest?

Become a member to follow this project and never miss any updates