Gear Calculations
I could not be bothered tying to work this out, someone has done it before, I just have to find it.
On my search journey I found the gear system we are using are call Epicyclic gears.
Anyway I did find a website that published the equation for this specific gear system (http://www.efunda.com/DesignStandards/gears/gears_epicyclic_train.cfm).
If the gear train is Na/Nb/Nc and Nd/Ne (i.e. Sun1/Planet1/Ring1 and Planet2/Ring2) where Ring1 (Nc) is fixed ,and the planets (Nb and Nd) are locked the the reduction ratio is:
- R=(1+Nc/Na)/(1-Nc*Nd/Nb/Ne)
Here is the worked example from the website:
Gear Train – Worked Example | |||
NA | 21 | Sun 1 | Driven |
NB | 61 | Planet 1 | Locked to Planet 2 |
NC | 141 | Ring 1 | Fixed |
ND | 41 | Planet 2 | Locked to Planet 1 |
NE | 121 | Ring 2 | Output |
|
Gearing 1 | 7.7143 | Check |
|
Gearing 2 | 0.2168 | Check |
|
Gearing | 0.0281 | Check |
|
Reduction | 35.5870 |
|
Here is Daren's design:
Gear Train – Daren | |||
NA | 18 | Sun 1 | Driven |
NB | 21 | Planet 1 | Locked to Planet 2 |
NC | 60 | Ring 1 | Fixed |
ND | 21 | Planet 2 | Locked to Planet 1 |
NE | 57 | Ring 2 | Output |
|
Gearing 1 | 4.3333 |
|
|
Gearing 2 | -0.0526 |
|
|
Gearing | -0.0121 |
|
|
Reduction | -82.3333 |
|
Note the sign change in the reduction ratio, this appear to be correct.
And here is my five planet version:
Gear Train – Alan v2 | |||
NA | 25 | Sun 1 | Driven |
NB | 20 | Planet 1 | Locked to Planet 2 |
NC | 65 | Ring 1 | Fixed |
ND | 20 | Planet 2 | Locked to Planet 1 |
NE | 60 | Ring 2 | Output |
|
Gearing 1 | 3.6000 |
|
|
Gearing 2 | -0.0833 |
|
|
Gearing | -0.0231 |
|
|
Reduction | -43.2000 |
|
Realisation
The gear design has migrated such that the requirement for the two planetary gears to have the same number of teeth is no longer valid.
AlanX
Discussions
Become a Hackaday.io Member
Create an account to leave a comment. Already have an account? Log In.
First stage is 3.3~:1 for mine, not 4.3:1.
Yes, the negative sign is correct. It switches directions depending on if the output has more teeth than the input or vice versa.
33:1 is a more workable ratio than the original. Good job.
Also, at this point you have contributed more to the project than 90% of all contributors I have had for projects. @Morning.Star is still winning in that regard, but the two of you may just change my mind about contributors... :)
Are you sure? yes | no