Powering A Cellphone With Gasoline

Battery energy densities are insignificant compared to those of liquid fuels. Can we safely and inoffensively charge gadgets with gasoline?

Public Chat
Similar projects worth following
The goal is to generate electricity sufficient to charge a cellphone from 3 to 6 oz. of gasoline (white camping fuel). The fuel is oxidized catalytically to generate heat at below flame temperatures. This then powers a thermoelectric generator (TEG), which generates electricity from a temperature difference. The catalytic oxidation is at a low enough temperature to avoid damaging the somewhat fragile TEG, but high enough above room temperature to generate significant power. The device emits limited fumes and no smoke, is silent, has no open flame, has no moving parts, is portable, and operates at lower temperatures than other internal combustion engines.

Batteries suck. Even the best batteries have woefully small energy densities, either on a MegaJoules/ Liter (volume) or MegaJoules/ kilogram (weight) basis. Most chemical fuels, on the other hand, have energy densities many magnitudes higher. Consider how far you can walk on the calories of a sandwich, a granola bar, or a sugary beverage. That's a lot of energy in a small package. See this figure. If you can't find lithium batteries, look towards the origin. 

My cellphone is powered by a lithium battery that is recharged by a 5 volt adapter plugged into a 120 VAC line. This comes from a transformer that goes to a high-tension power line to a large generator which (in my area) is powered by gasoline or coal. (BTW, anthracite coal has one of the highest energy densities per unit volume, which makes it a terrific compact fuel for things like steam trains.)  Any time a battery is charged, half of the energy is wasted as heat. It just is. There are other losses associated with the transmission of power. By the time it gets to my phone, the overall efficiency is-- well, not great. Could I do things more, uh, directly? 

This battery powers my cellphone for about 14 hours under normal use. And then there are days where the battery only lasts half a day. This is frustrating for me. Sure, I could change a bank of lithium batteries, but just look at the chart!

Energy is all around me. I mentally explored a large solution space, including solar, wind, human powered (very promising), glucose fuel cells (have a sip of Gatorade, phone!) and various generators. Although each of these are fascinating and worthy of exploration, I eventually became enamored of a gasoline- or diesel- fueled solution.

Although I love the idea of recharging my cellphone with a small engine such as an RC airplane motor or a string trimmer engine, I had trouble visualizing those things indoors. Smoke and noise would make these, uh, offensive.

I eventually settled on the Zippo hand-warmer system as being one to emulate. Zippo-style hand warmers [INSERT LINK OR PIC HERE] generate mellow heat by "burning" lighter fluid without really burning it. Instead, the lighter fluid is oxidized at sub-flame temperatures by a catalyst, generally a finely-powdered metal (like platinum) on a mineral fiber substrate ("rockwool"). Heating this up to a modest temperature (usually by brief exposure to a flame) starts the catalysis, and the fuel-air mixture gets oxidized without forming actual fire. They emit fumes, but no soot or smoke.

A thermoelectric generator (TEG) use the Seebeck effect [LINK?] to directly generate electricity from a difference in temperature. Yeah, it's not a Stirling engine, but it could be considered a sort of solid-state heat engine. They are, sadly, only about 5% to 8% efficient. BUT they are solid state and quiet, with no moving parts and no noisy explosions. 

Another drawback to TEGs is that reasonably priced ones fall to pieces at temperatures above their solder melting temperature, which is only slightly above 200 degrees C. Even more reasonably priced ones (which are really Peltier cooling elements sold as TEGs by the unscrupulous) fall apart at 150 degrees C, right about the point where you start getting significant power.

"Candle generators" exist, where a tealight or other flame directly powers a TEG to light LEDs or whatever. This will damage a TEG almost immediately, unless it's one of the pricey high-temp ones or something kludged from iron and copper, etc. My guess from looking at diagrams of a commercially available one is that heat sinks dump heat to reduce the temperature low enough to avoid damage to the TEG.

On the other hand, the "hand warmer" produces a steady heat well below flame temperatures, a good match for a sensitive TEG that needs to be hot but not TOO hot.

My device is a kludged-together apparatus that comprises (from bottom to top); a stainless steel hip flask filled with carbon felt as a fuel reservoir;...

Read more »

View project log

Enjoy this project?



crun wrote 09/02/2022 at 00:28 point

I'm impressed, this is quite a clever idea. (White gas has a significantly higher J/kg than butane when you include the steel canister weight)

Butane powered soldering irons with the hot air tip would be another COTS heat source. Butane soldering irons use iron mesh as the catalyst, it's not anything fancy AFAIK.

I have thought at length about a butane powered immersion cooker/charger using catalytic combustion based on this, but hot side temperature is critical - too low and you don't get much power, too high and you destroy it.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Gabriel wrote 06/06/2020 at 12:42 point

i quite like this project. Get it working and later figure out if more "Acceptable" fuels would work, or not.

  Are you sure? yes | no

bryan.lowder wrote 06/05/2020 at 20:49 point

Geez, guys, I have fewer than a hundred words yet. Go easy on me. I was hoping originally to make a glucose-powered fuel cell, but that's a little beyond me. Gas could easily be substituted with wood gas, cellulosic ethanol, biodiesel, or whatever. We could probably even make a crude oil substitute out of plastic harvested from the ocean, cooked for a while in low oxygen. So gimme a minute. Lithium batteries have woeful energy densities and there is waste energy at every charging step-- and most of the electricity around here is made with coal and gas. This is more direct and probably more efficient.  Solar and wind got some consideration too.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Entunassa wrote 06/04/2020 at 16:26 point

I guess, Gravis proposes not to burn any (fossile) fuel for taking electric energy from it? Check out to the BIOLITE CAMP STOVE, which burns twigs instead of fuel.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Gravis wrote 06/04/2020 at 07:33 point

Talk about taking a step in the wrong direction.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Similar Projects

Does this project spark your interest?

Become a member to follow this project and never miss any updates