Close

PCB Revision 2: "Let's make one that works this time"

A project log for Time Circuits Timepiece

A practical-size, Back to the Future themed digital clock mimicking the "Present Time" portion of the DeLorean's time circuit displays.

Stephen HoldawayStephen Holdaway 11/18/2018 at 03:523 Comments

After letting this project rest for a good 15 months (with occasional tinkering), I've picked it up over a weekend, verified the new schematic with its shift-register + LED driver configuration to drive the common-cathode 16-segment displays is sane, and completed the layout for the new board.

Since the last update I posted here, the main changes have been:

I was unsure all of the driver circuitry was going to fit on in the limited space there is around through-holes, but managed to get it all in:

Time Circuits PCB layout

Coming back to this project fresh also let me pick up a few mistakes:

The two PORTB pins on the STM8S003F3 are "true open-drain" pins that don't have the ability to run in push-pull mode (ie. source current).

I've added high value pull-ups to both of these pins so they can drive logic levels.

The 74HC595s enable each segment's LED driver by sinking its GND pin, but will provide +5V to this pin when not sinking, rather than being high-Z.

Applying 5V to GND shouldn't be an issue unless the driver's +Vs sags or there are spikes on its GND at +5V that create a significant reverse voltage. The BCR402W datasheet states an absolute maximum rating of 0.5V reverse on any terminal, but in practice I've seen no adverse effects testing this on the bench for 30 mins at 5V reversed (which is 10x the reverse voltage than I'd expect to see in this circuit). With reversed polarity I can't detect any current until 9.63V, where 50 nA flows, and at 32V only 1 mA flows.

If this diagram in the BCR402W datasheet is actually representative of its internals, the reverse voltage tolerance of GND to +Vs should be greater than 0.5V - probably limited by the emitter-base breakdown voltage of the PNP transistor (typically around 5V). I'm fairly confident these aren't going to explode suddenly from small excursions past the 0.5V limit in the datasheet, but if segments begin to quit I'll have a possible culprit.

Also:

The rev 2 schematic now looks like this:

Time Circuit Schematic

After another round of checks, I'll send this off to the fab!

If I've screwed something up this time around, it should hopefully be possible to bodge, unlike the previous disaster.

Edit: I made some last-minute mistakes on the silkscreen which I picked up after ordering, but fortunately I'd made a typo in the fab's submission form, so they rejected the order. The submitted board now looks a bit tidier:

Discussions

Jan wrote 11/18/2018 at 11:48 point

I wonder about your STM programming header. Silkscreen doesn't match the circuit?!

  Are you sure? yes | no

Stephen Holdaway wrote 11/18/2018 at 18:12 point

Darn, welll spotted - I rewired that header at the last minute to match STM's recommend SWIM header, but as I was working in high contrast mode where the silkscreen is greyed out, I missed changing it!

  Are you sure? yes | no

Jan wrote 11/18/2018 at 18:59 point

You're welcome! I try to make silkscreen check a habit now, because I have mislabeled Rx/Tx and the like tooooooo damn often!

  Are you sure? yes | no