My watch runs off "disposable" lithium cells. I retrofit it to run like a grandfather clock: weights and gravity.
To make the experience fit your profile, pick a username and tell us what interests you.
We found and based on your interests.
Or: Why Nobody Does This At Large Scale
Each stage is subject to a holding torque set by the static friction of the bearing used. The friction force develops a torque with the arm length set by the radius of the axle.
In the first few stages, this torque is negligible. But as the gear ratio increases from stage to stage, a sizeable input torque quickly scales down to a few microNm, even the tiny friction seen in a ball bearing supporting a few grams can become too great:
This model doesn't include the gear teeth themselves, so it's probably much worse than this, but this illustrates the problem pretty well.
Currently I cannot seem to turn the 7th stage with the heaviest weight I can support (10lb) and the widest spool I can accommodate, 20mm. I may need to drop the last stage!

Update on the last ~week of mechanics work.
I'm using Onshape to design the mechanical setup.
I'm using a spur gear generator feature; I can't figure out how to link to it here but of the couple I've tried this is my favorite.
All parts shown in Onshape are 3d-printed with plain PLA. Structure is M3 threaded standoffs. Everything is set up to fit on the bed of my Bambu lab A1 mini.
Stages are a series of double-reduction idler gears:
| axle | input | output | ratio | axle | bearing | ratio, tot. |
| 1 | spool for rope | 60T gear, m=1mm | 1 | 1/8" brass rod | plain | 1 |
| 2 | 12T m=1mm | 60T, m=0.75mm | 5 | 1/8" brass rod | plain | 5 |
| 3 | 12T m=0.75 | 60T m=0.75 | 5 | 3/64" brass | plain | 25 |
| 4 | 12T m=0.75 | 60T m=0.75 | 5 | 3/64" brass | plain | 125 |
| 5 | 12T m=0.75 | 60T m=0.75 | 5 | 1mm SS | Ball | 625 |
| 6 | 12T m=0.75 | 60T m=0.75 | 5 | 1mm SS | Ball | 3125 |
| 7 | 12T m=0.75 | 60T m=0.75 | 5 | 1mm SS | Ball | 15625 |
| 8 | 12T m=0.75 | magnet disc | 5 | 1mm SS | Ball | 78125 |
Input torque is determined by charge mass and spool diameter.
The first few stages of the gear train use plain bearings -- simple brass rods from the art supply store as axles, through a bore hole in 3d-printed PLA. I'm using 1/8" and 3/64" rods for the first 2 and second 2 bearings, respectively. In these first few stages friction isn't really a concern because input torque is high.
The next 4 axles use tiny ball bearings I found on amazon. I bought them to fit into my existing design to retrofit plain bearings without really grokking how tiny these are; by far the smallest ball bearings I've ever seen. 3mm OD, 1mmID, 1mm thick. They reduce friction by a lot; hard to quantify without better testing I don't have time for, but a flicked gear spins about 4x longer than in a plain bearing. Friction becomes exponentially relevant at later stages.
Since the ball bearing ID is smaller than 3/64", I use 1mm stainless steel wire as the axles here. I pull a bit off the wire spool, chuck one end in a drill, and spin it while pulling on the wire with needle-nose pliers. This straightens it, thins the wire a little, and tapers one end for easier assembly.
Gears are spaced on axles using bushings made from 1mm heat-shrink tubing. Clearance is really important.
Create an account to leave a comment. Already have an account? Log In.
Become a member to follow this project and never miss any updates
About Us Contact Hackaday.io Give Feedback Terms of Use Privacy Policy Hackaday API Do not sell or share my personal information