close-circle
Close
0%
0%

ShooSmoke - Smoke Detector in Public Area

Do you know that passive smoking is more harmful than the active?

Similar projects worth following
But in fact, no consistent rules for smoking found in public places such as parks and children playgrounds. So, how do we tackle the smoking problem and get a win-win solution for both sides? A free-smoking place for nonsmokers and a smoking area for the smokers?

ShooSmoke can be the solution!

ShooSmoke is basically created using a smoke sensor connected to a Raspberry Pi. We can put ShooSmoke in random public places. When it detect smokes, it will activate the sensor. The signal of smoking detected will be sent to the authorities and it will also tell the smokers the nearest smoking area.

Therefore, the smokers can smoke at the more appropriate place and the nonsmokers can will not be affected.

  • 1 × Raspberry Pi 3 model B
  • 1 × TP-Link
  • 1 × Smoke Detector

Enjoy this project?

Share

Discussions

Yann Guidon / YGDES wrote 04/06/2017 at 01:21 point

I don't need a smoke detector. I have an integrated one in my nose. My tongue tickles when someone smokes even 10m away.

  Are you sure? yes | no

ken conrad wrote 04/04/2017 at 15:55 point

Consider this... smoke is a known conductor. What about a high-voltage deterrent system? Detect - warn - ZAP ??

  Are you sure? yes | no

Caleb Hanneman wrote 04/04/2017 at 13:32 point

I attempted to do something similar for the prize last year. It kind of fell flat for me. I hope that all goes well for you! I wait to see how things turn out.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Shanti wrote 04/05/2017 at 21:57 point

Thanks!

  Are you sure? yes | no

Catlyn wrote 04/04/2017 at 12:30 point

This project is a cheat... So many likes in just 1 day

  Are you sure? yes | no

Shanti wrote 04/05/2017 at 21:56 point

You want to know? Actually I just asked a lot of my friends to like this project and they did. No cheat :D

  Are you sure? yes | no

indirarussia wrote 04/04/2017 at 00:22 point

Хороший проект, и я подумал, что это очень полезно

  Are you sure? yes | no

vinothlkrt7795 wrote 04/03/2017 at 14:32 point

Adingotha

How this much likes ?????????

  Are you sure? yes | no

AlexanderKrishna wrote 04/03/2017 at 13:05 point

i want to make similar project to my highschool project sains. Looking forward to your project

  Are you sure? yes | no

georgia wrote 04/03/2017 at 13:12 point

science not sains

  Are you sure? yes | no

Edgar wrote 04/03/2017 at 12:50 point

shoooo what a funny name

  Are you sure? yes | no

akmalghifar wrote 04/03/2017 at 13:00 point

Don't come here just to say that. Appreciate the project

  Are you sure? yes | no

ashker hart wrote 04/03/2017 at 12:40 point

good idea but would be more specific if you explain it more

  Are you sure? yes | no

Adrianna Severina wrote 04/03/2017 at 12:27 point

utile per il paese in via di sviluppo!! 

  Are you sure? yes | no

Naveena Roshni wrote 04/03/2017 at 12:22 point

ग़जब का


  Are you sure? yes | no

huongthi wrote 04/03/2017 at 12:36 point

you speak English huh? this is worldwide discussion

  Are you sure? yes | no

Thomas Kunz wrote 04/03/2017 at 12:07 point

quite useful bc yea ew I hate smoker, theyre killing themselves though

  Are you sure? yes | no

Clayton G. Hobbs wrote 04/02/2017 at 15:41 point

> Do you know that passive smoking is more harmful than the active?

That's an extraordinary claim, so I'll need to see some extraordinary evidence for it before it sounds believable (i.e. peer-reviewed scientific studies, not propaganda from anti-smoking groups).  I can't imagine how breathing smoke at such a drastically reduced concentration could possibly be worse than inhaling it directly.

  Are you sure? yes | no

mrgray wrote 04/03/2017 at 11:38 point

Anyway in my opinion it's logical dude

  Are you sure? yes | no

Katherine Pel wrote 04/03/2017 at 11:52 point

Yeah, I saw ads on telly telling people that passive smoker is more harmful

  Are you sure? yes | no

indirarussia wrote 04/04/2017 at 00:23 point

Я подумал, что это логично, поскольку в каждой сигарете есть фильтр, а не пассивный

  Are you sure? yes | no

Legrange wrote 04/10/2017 at 19:31 point

It is indeed a massive claim. And very likely a false one.

An active smoker inhales all the fresh smoke and some of the exhaled and burn smoke, so even if passive smoking was more harmful than active smoking, somehow, they're not only getting the passive smoke but also the active smoke.

  Are you sure? yes | no

olujukeff-7898 wrote 04/02/2017 at 13:41 point

in my country, we have fixed rules for smokers although not everyone obey it

  Are you sure? yes | no

indira4758 wrote 04/02/2017 at 13:26 point

Nice idea! Because I really don't like smoker smoking near me.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Similar Projects

Does this project spark your interest?

Become a member to follow this project and never miss any updates