Close
0%
0%

Infinty power and energy

Application
1-the idea could be used to generate infinity energy for cars and planes
2-it can be used in smart phones to prduce infinity ene

Similar projects worth following
Application
1-the idea could be used to generate infinity energy for cars and planes
2-it can be used in smart phones to prduce infinity energy
3-it can be used to generate infinity power For homes and places



By using Hydrogen fuel cell we can obtain Hydrogen and oxygen from water electrolysis then we can obtain electric current (DC) AND WATER CAN BE OBTAINED AGAIN FROM (H2+O2) THAT MENTIONED BEFORE SO NO LOSS OF WATER .

Enjoy this project?

Share

Discussions

mahmoudbasyony1 wrote 02/08/2018 at 20:39 point

the fuel cell is more expensive it costs 12000$ 

This make a project is hard 

I search for someone have the fuel cell 

The firt system easy make 

  Are you sure? yes | no

mahmoudbasyony1 wrote 02/07/2018 at 21:45 point

thank you my brother @ActualDragon  

I appreciate this

My problem is that no one wants to help me in my country 

I hope to travel to a place that respects science and thinking

  Are you sure? yes | no

ActualDragon wrote 02/07/2018 at 23:23 point

Sorry man, most people, all people, other than the few still trying, don't classify it as science. Same with christianity though. If you want to seek help, find some of those shitty looking newscasts about the "crazy" inventors. I have a book with some 70's attempts, i'll drop a name- jeremiah 33:3, a machine not so unlike yours, the inventor- arnold burke, 80 years old living in texas. I looked up his address, and was going to contact him, but never did. If you want help, i'd start there. Don't give up, If you do it you can shove burning wads of cash up these guy's asses.

  Are you sure? yes | no

ActualDragon wrote 02/07/2018 at 00:06 point

#Almost Perpetual Motion- pretty much the same thing, but knock yourself out. don't listen to these guys, my favorite is the wright brothers. They were basically outcasts because they thought they could achieve heavier than air flight. It's not going to be easy though, keep that in mind. Anyone who thinks they know everything are the stupid ones holding progress back. We don't have the whole universe figured out, and never will. In an infinite universe, all things are possible, just not all things are easy. Keep trying, manind will figure it out sooner or later, trust me.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Nathan Wride wrote 02/07/2018 at 20:11 point

Honestly someone might as well do it, either they'll make a discovery that changes the world or they'll learn a shitload while trying.

  Are you sure? yes | no

JL9791 wrote 02/07/2018 at 21:40 point

Perhaps, but plenty of people have tried, both more knowledgeable and less and none have succeeded. Using the Wright brothers is not a good example for this reason: apparently reality allows for heavier-than-air flight otherwise all the bugs, birds, and bats couldn't fly. Reality does not seem to allow for non-subatomic/quantum scale violations of thermodynamics. At the very least, he may be able to get a fairly long lasting power source (depending on the power draw of devices connected to it).

  Are you sure? yes | no

mahmoudbasyony1 wrote 02/07/2018 at 21:47 point

I see something you do not see 

Thx for u 😀 

  Are you sure? yes | no

Nathan Wride wrote 02/05/2018 at 00:33 point

Check out this for a quick explanation of why it won't work: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/electrol.html

Keep in mind that your electrolysis isn't 100% efficient and neither is your fuel cell, both have resistance in the wires, are not pure etc. The process requires that you input power plus external heat to split the water, and need to dump heat from the cell so you can't have the closed system you claim.

I wish you luck though, no harm in trying and I'm sure you'll learn a lot about thermodynamics!

  Are you sure? yes | no

Nathan Wride wrote 02/05/2018 at 00:39 point

Also you are limited by the water you can split, and since the hydrogen-fuel cell performs the reverse reaction of the electrolysis you cannot get more power out of the system than you have put in with the solar panel, so essentially you are making a really expensive and novel solar cell.

  Are you sure? yes | no

JL9791 wrote 02/07/2018 at 23:49 point

I took another look at it...perhaps he can use excess electricity generated by the solar panels to electrolyse the water in the tank. Then, during periods of less/no sun, the fuel cell can kick in to generate electricity (and replenish the water reservoir).

  Are you sure? yes | no

mahmoudbasyony1 wrote 02/03/2018 at 12:45 point

Most thermodynamic laws I'm not convinced with it  

This system in a box and the box is isolated 

No heat out 😀 

  Are you sure? yes | no

JL9791 wrote 02/06/2018 at 15:11 point

The box is part of the system. Some of the heat generated by the components in the box will reach the box, the box will transfer that heat to whatever is outside the box, such as the air.

  Are you sure? yes | no

mahmoudbasyony1 wrote 02/01/2018 at 03:49 point

I wish do this project but my university didn’t have any equipment and the fuel cell is so expensive

  Are you sure? yes | no

JL9791 wrote 02/01/2018 at 03:38 point

No, it does not provide infinite energy. What about energy loss due to heat dissipation? Can you capture all the heat and put it back into the system?

  Are you sure? yes | no

mahmoudbasyony1 wrote 02/01/2018 at 03:46 point

The energy output  from the solar panel is  240kw to make water analysis 

And the output from fuel cell is 1000kw  

  Are you sure? yes | no

mahmoudbasyony1 wrote 02/02/2018 at 08:10 point

The system is a closed system no het loss 

And Heat is a catalyst in chemical reactions

  Are you sure? yes | no

mahmoudbasyony1 wrote 02/02/2018 at 08:11 point

The system is a closed system no het loss 

And Heat is a catalyst in chemical reactions

  Are you sure? yes | no

JL9791 wrote 02/03/2018 at 01:24 point

The system is not closed.  At best, the only closed system is the universe. Everything else within it is open. I bet that if you were to build this device and I pointed an IR thermometer or IR camera at different locations on it, I would get temperature readings (different ones at different locations)...unless you figured out how to break thermodynamics.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Similar Projects

Does this project spark your interest?

Become a member to follow this project and never miss any updates