FirePick Delta, the Open Source MicroFactory

An affordable electronics manufacturing system for hobbyists, students, & small businesses. Inspired by RepRap. Powered by OpenPnP/FirePick.

Similar projects worth following
FirePick Delta is an open-source electronics manufacturing system, inspired by RepRap and powered by OpenPnP and FirePick's own Computer Vision software. We are taking the beginning steps towards a smart appliance that can manufacture electronic circuit boards in a home or office environment. Our machine is able to assemble open-source hardware boards like Arduino and Raspberry Pi accessories, and also has the capability to 3D print. It features an auto-tool changer that allows multiple plastic extruders, and/or multiple SMT vacuum nozzles. Other tools and applications will be available as our product matures.

We will be launching a Kickstarter campaign once we have a working prototype.


FirePick Delta is an affordable, open-source electronics manufacturing system that sits on your desktop. It's capable of building complex electronic circuit assemblies, like Arduino and Raspberry Pi accessories. It is also able to 3D print plastic parts, just like a standard 3D printer. It assembles circuit boards just like a conventional pick-and-place machine, by using a vacuum nozzle and camera with computer vision to pick up surface-mount parts from component feeders, and precisely place them down on the circuit board. Our machine has an auto-tool changer, and we're working on designing other tools besides the SMT vacuum tip and the 3D print hotend. The system is capable of holding up to four tools and interchanging between them automatically. This also makes it one of the most versatile 3D printers out there, because it can print in four colors of plastic (or in four separate types of plastic, which would allow a single model to have a mixture of PLA, ABS, nylon, and NinjaFlex, for example). 

Pick and place machines are used around the world to assemble electronic circuit assemblies, however they usually sell for $50,000 to $500,000. Our machine has a price point of $300 to $5000, depending on modules installed. We should be able to hit that price point by leveraging the open-source technology of the RepRap 3D printer movement. The FirePick Delta is designed to almost completely self-replicate. It is capable of 3d printing its own parts out of PLA or ESD-sensitive ABS plastic. It will also be capable of assembling its own electronic circuit boards. We plan to be the first successful, commercially available RepRap 3d printer to have the power of electronics self-replication. We envision a future where anyone can design (or download existing) electronic projects, and manufacture them in their own home, rather than outsourcing to a traditional factory. This approach saves time and money, and is a much more sustainable solution. FirePick Delta will enable a new wave of small businesses and entrepreneurs to provide unique, bespoke, niche items to the general public, that would be unprofitable for a large conglomerate corporation to manufacture. If you've ever had an electronic project that involved soldering surface-mount electronics, this machine is an incredibly cheap and fun way to do it. If you've ever wanted to sell an electronic board that you've created, and need a way to make lots of them, this machine is for you.

Important Documents and Links

Bill of Materials

Note: Our BOM will eventually be in our custom FireBOM system, but we’re still in the process of getting that populated (Note: the official “Components” page links there). We have written some clever python scripts to get this data transferred over to the new system, but in the meantime, it’s spread across a few sources:

Project Logs and Other Pages:


NOTE: The CMS is kind of wonky at the moment), use the links below if the Youtube previews aren't showing up...

HaD Video #1 (Quarterfinals, July 20, 2014):

HaD Video #2 (Semifinals, September 28, 2014):

Youtube Playlist for other FirePick Delta related videos :-)

Features / Specs

Intended Usage:

  • Prototyping and small runs of PCB’s (under 100 per run). Not intended to be used for mass production.
  • Hobbyists, Makerspaces, high school and college students,...
Read more »

View all 16 components

  • We're No Longer the $300 Pick and Place / 3D Printer

    Neil Jansen03/13/2015 at 02:46 6 comments

    There's been a lot of cool stuff going on in our project, even though I haven't updated this page a much in the last six months or so. Here' s a quick summary:


    Established in December 2014, I started Tin Whiskers Technology, LLC in order to provide a platform to sell kits and finished units to various people around the world. I realized early on that my business skills were lacking, so I brought on Felix Banuchi as a co-founder. Between his MBA and startup experience, and my technical leadership, we're hoping that we can avoid the common pitfalls that open-source companies have made recently (some bad for the community, like Makerbot going closed source, and some bad for the companies like Arduino LLC vs. Arduino SRL)

    The name Tin Whiskers is sort of a dual-meaning. Most veteran electrical engineers and other folks in the world of electronics manufacturing know about tin whisker growth all too well. It's the metallurgical phenomenon where little metallic tendrils seem to grow out of a flat metallic surface. This problem has worsened since the switch to lead-free solders and other repercussions of RoHS. On the other hand, tin whiskers also means something to the lay person, it brings up images of cats, hipster beards, and robots... Which seems very fitting for such a cool company.


    This week, we've begun selling pre-orders to our initial group of beta testers. We're doing 50 units for the first run, followed by possibly more after that. The idea is to get hardware in the hands of as many developers as we can, so that we can get immediate feedback on a common hardware platform. This is much better than a DIY approach where everyone ends up with different machines. Obviously, hardware incompatibilities, lighting conditions, feeder types, machine accuracy and precision, differences between DIY machines vary greatly... And that added complexity makes software development a real nightmare.. that is, unless we can get identical kits in the hands of our testers. We set out to do that in late December, and now in March, a few months later, we're to that point, albeit a few months behind where we wanted to be.


    In order to make this happen, we've had to do a lot of parts sourcing, cost estimation, BOM analysis, design-for-manufacturing changes, etc. I quickly realized that my original estimate of $300 was off by quite a bit. Those that have been following this project for a while, remember that this project was initially titled "the $300 Pick and Place / 3D printer". I REALLY did want to make a machine this cheap, and that number was based on what I wanted the final price to be.. Our BOM cost has hovered from $300-700 depending on options... I figured that assuming I got some wholesale accounts, and get some sourcing lined up, that I could get the price down to 1/2 of that, sell for a bit of a markup, and still meet the $300 goal. Well, after Felix joined the team, I quickly realized that's not the way things work. Once our company was formed and we actually tried to secure these wholesale and vendor accounts, we've not gotten a single 50% price break. That simply won't happen unless we're selling 5000+ units. That might actually happen someday, if I get my wish. We also have to make enough markup as to not go out of business quickly. We're not getting rich by any means -- We'd get better markups manufacturing women's perfume or costume jewelry... Or social media web-apps, e.g. the next AirBnb or Instagram.. Hardware companies are very capital intensive, ours is no different. We've got a lot of money tied up in this, with not much to show for it at this point, other than a lot of hope, and some excited and eager beta testers.

    In the meantime, FirePick Delta will not cost $300. I take full responsibility for anyone that's disappointed in the price difference, by the way. We're even still hesitant to throw...

    Read more »

  • Beta Test Kits, Coming to a Hacker Near You...

    Neil Jansen03/01/2015 at 03:01 0 comments

  • ESD Mitigation Strategy

    Neil Jansen09/28/2014 at 22:40 0 comments

    Electro-static discharge is a big deal when you're working with modern SMT parts. Doubly so when you're dealing wiht SMT component feeders. Things moving around generate a charge, and these charges can even levitate parts right out of the carrier tape.

    We have a two part approach for mitigating ESD:

    Conductive Coating for all Acrylic and Anodized Surfaces

    In the USA, the best source is TechSpray Licron, available from Mouser.  Other countries have this listed under different names.

    ESD-Safe Conductive ABS 3D Printer Filament

    Part two of our approach is to use ABS plastic 3D printer filament, that is conductive, by impregnating it with carbon nanotubes :D  

    We source our filament from 3DXTech, which can also be bought from PushPlastic, where I buy the rest of my normal PLA filament.

    You can buy the ESD-safe filament here:

    3DXTech 3DXNano product page

    3DXTech 3DXNano Filament MSDS Sheet

  • SMT Component Feeders

    Neil Jansen09/28/2014 at 22:32 4 comments

    This is a stub... Stay tuned, hopefully I'll have this done before the deadline!

    Modular Feeder System

    Everything on our system is modular, including the feeders.  Rather than having individual blade-style feeders (which are extremely handy, but complicated to pull of on a small scale), we decided on a 60mm base size, that can hold a certain number of tapes / tubes, depending on the component size(s).

    4x 8mm feeders:

    3x 12mm feeders:

    1x 16 and 1x 24mm feeder:

    1x 32mm feeder:

    1x 44mm feeder:

    Not to mention, any size of weird tube, like for a custom choke or coil, or any other weird specialized stuff, new types of feeders can be created, and added to this system with just a basic amount of CAD work and 3D printing.  

    ESD Mitigation

    If you haven't seen our post about ESD Mitigation, please read it here:

    Modular Feeder Holder

    All of our modular feeders go into a 3D printed feeder holder, that attaches to the aluminum extrusion rails with an M5 x 8mm button-head cap screw: 

    The curved bit gently guides tape out the bottom of the machine:

    Tape Feeders

    We assume that for home and prototyping use, that most people will not have dozens and dozens of spools laying around.  They're really expensive and not needed for general prototyping.  So we will assume that most people will be loading in cut tape strip pieces.  And there's no reason to bring in the complexity of a full-auto tape feeder if you're just dealing with cut tape strips.

    HOWEVER, it is exremely likely that many home users may have one or two large reels for those jobs where you're laying down tons of LEDs or 0.1uf capacitors, or whatever.  So right now our system has two full-auto tape feeders, so that the system is less tied to using the drag-pin feed.

    Tape Feeder (drag pin feed)

    Tape Feeder (full auto)

    Tape Feeder (strip lanes)

    (pics will be up, check back soon!)

    Tube Feeders

    We plan on supporting these in the very near future.  We just wanted to concentrate on the tape feeders first. :-)

    Tray Feeders

    We don't support JEDEC trays, because they're so big, but sometimes it's still nice to be able to pick up some random parts that either don't have carrier tape, or are on a small piece of cut tape that would be impractical to load in a normal feeder. So, we support little trays that allow you to load in a few parts at a time.  OpenPnP already has some pretty neat logic that knows how to get to the center of a part, based on the tray dimensions, and the part's dimensions.

  • FirePick Delta System Design Document and Youtube Video

    Neil Jansen08/19/2014 at 05:09 0 comments

    Here's our Introductory Youtube video for the Hackaday Contest, Stage 1 & 2, as per the Official Rules:

    Here's our System-Level diagram (still a work in progress):

    Admittedly the system diagram is very busy, but it does accurately reflect our desired system configuration.  I will try to explain the various parts of the diagram and how they work together. 

    Read more »

  • Camera and Computer Vision

    Neil Jansen07/13/2014 at 14:17 1 comment

    In this post, I'll explain the importance of Computer Vision and how we plan to accomplish this. I'll also cover the state of our computer vision system and where we're going from here. 

    In the picture above, you can see a Raspberry Pi camera, looking at itself in a mirror, in order to see the nozzle, and and parts that might be hanging around there.  We can use computer vision to calculate and adjust the part offset and rotation, to make up for the fact that it's impossible for us to pick a part from a component feeder with enough precision.  We can also use computer vision to calculate the offset of the nozzle to the camera, not only at zero degrees rotation of the nozzle, but also for other rotations, which means we can calibrate out the wobble of the cheap Luer lock syringe tip that we use.  The mirror technique has some challenges though, so we will be offering a traditional upward-looking vision system, via a second camera, in the weeks/months to come.

    Read more »

  • 6/29/2014-Present - FirePick Delta Failblog and Wins

    Neil Jansen07/07/2014 at 05:23 7 comments

    This entry will serve as an omnibus collection of fails, and wins, at the system level.  I'd rather keep them together, instead of having dozens of tiny updates, each with their own entry. 

    As of July 8 2014, we are successfully picking and placing SMT components with the FirePick Delta prototype.  This is a huge accomplishment in itself, but we've really just started.  Although FPD has a 5MP camera mounted to the end effector, and a full suite of custom computer vision functions ready to go, we've still got some integration to do before we can use it at a system-level, for drag-pin feeder advancement, up-looking vision, and fiducial recognition.  It's a minor amount of work, but everything takes time.  For today, we're just trying to make sure that we've got all the various parts of the system online and working together.  You have to crawl before you can walk, as they say.

    Read more »

  • 6/15/2014 - Delta mechanism simulation and accuracy determination

    Neil Jansen06/14/2014 at 14:42 10 comments

    In our previous post, we explained what a delta mechanism is, and why we decided to use it for this project.

    This post will hopefully shed some light on how we came up with the arm lengths, ratios, and other parameters that determine how accurate and fast it can be.  There's quite a few examples of delta robots out there, and even a few pages with the necessary math to calculate position.  But there's not really a lot of "why" out there, or a reasoning behind the chosen geometries and ratios were chosen.  I'm not a math guru, but I will attempt to explain why I chose my design as I did.

    Read more »

  • Delta mechanism design and Frame construction

    Neil Jansen06/07/2014 at 16:47 2 comments

    This post will give the reasonings behind the frame and the delta mechanism design.  We're using a pretty unique design, in fact I'm not aware of any successful pick and place machines that use a delta mechanism.  We'll explain why we went against conventional wisdom and chose the delta mechanism.  We'll also explain what the heck a delta mechanism is for the more casual readers.

    Here's what your 'status-quo' SMT pick and place looks like, with  Hackaday judge LadyAda for size comparison:

    Read more »

  • FirePick Delta - Introduction and Overview

    Neil Jansen05/05/2014 at 03:57 1 comment

    Welcome to the first installment of the $300 Pick and Place project build log.  This is the first of many build log entries that we will be posting over the next few months.

    The official name of this project is FirePick Delta.  We felt that the name "$300 Pick and Place" would be a better name for our Hackaday Projects page, since it better conveys to the world what our project is truly about.  Nobody knows what a FirePick Delta is (yet), but most of the regulars at Hackday know what a $300 Pick and Place machine is.  If not, don't worry.  We've got a section below just for you :)

    Introduction in Plain English

    We are developing a really cool robotic machine that is capable of assembling electronic circuit boards (it also 3D prints, and does some other stuff!).  It uses a vacuum nozzle to pick really tiny resistors and computer chips up, and place them down very carefully on a printed circuit board.  A lot of the parts are really tiny (sometimes only 0.6 mm x 0.3mm).  Sometimes they are really big, but the adjacent pins are so close together that the risk of two pins shorting out makes assembly difficult.  Our design uses a tiny digital camera board and custom computer vision software to ensure that the parts are being placed correctly.  Computer vision is really hard.  Especially if you're not a math major.

    There are existing machines that do this today, but they cost a LOT of money.  They range from $30,000 on the cheap end, to several hundred thousand dollars.  Large businesses are more than willing to pay these prices, because they produce millions of boards per year.  But what about the small business?  What about the the would-be tech startup?  What about the hobbyists, the college EE undergrads, hardware hackers, and makers?  It's pretty depressing actually.  Most resort to soldering every tiny component by hand (under a microscope if they're lucky enough to have access to one).  A few hobbyists and hackers went off and tried to make their own machine and failed miserably.  It's an incredibly complicated project by standards, so this wasn't surprising.

    The Holy Grail

    We are chasing the holy grail of rapid prototyping and electronics manufacturing.  Here are a few examples of the benefits that our project would provide:

    Design phase:

    • Electronics prototyping: Those dreadful breadboards, breakout boards, and Arduino shields can finally go away. Instead, work can begin on the first pcb prototype immediately, which reduces turnaround time. This doesn't work in all cases, but is a nice option to have.
    • Crowdsourced Parts Libraries: We will eventually aim to have a very conclusive library of parts for common EDA tools like EAGLE, KiCad, and Altium.  By crowdourcing the library parts out, and using a ranking and verification system to ensure their completeness and accuracy, the burden to the designer will be reduced tremendously.  This is a huge undertaking, but if our project reaches critical mass, it becomes within reach.
    • 3D printing of enclosures, fixtures, and replacement SMT machine parts.  This machine is capable of replicating its own plastic parts, including ESD-safe feeders and SMT nozzles.

    Manufacturing phase:

    • Quality control can be improved if the boards are being made locally, instead of in another continent.  Problems can be caught earlier.  In many cases, this will actually be much cheaper than outsourcing.
    • Intellectual property concerns: We're all about open source, but sometimes you don't want one of your boards outsourced to a sketchy manufacturer.  By making the boards locally, all of these concerns can be alleviated.
    • Small tech startups: Small companies and tech startups can buy a cheap $300 machine instead of taking out loans or giving up equity to buy a machine that costs 100-200 times that.
    • Just-In-Time Production / Kanban: Allows a smaller stock of finished boards to be...
    Read more »

View all 10 project logs

Enjoy this project?



Donovan M. wrote 09/07/2018 at 12:40 point

Wow! Impressive. Nice work.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Tiger Huang wrote 02/25/2017 at 08:30 point

Well, great job!

Thanks for bring RobotDigg's Hollow Shaft Stepper :-)

Lite Placer is a similar project I love.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Eric wrote 09/14/2016 at 15:21 point

Is this project still active? I dont see any activity here, though the Readme file on your Github has been touched in the last four months, nothing else looks at all recently updated or modified on any of your websites, excepting social media which I haven't checked.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Consultant wrote 09/27/2016 at 23:46 point

I have been following it for a while.   Its been abandon for a year.  It didn't work and the owner won't admit it.  Some community guys are playing around with it trying to redesign it to do something.  So far I have seen nothing to indicate progress.

  Are you sure? yes | no

bobcousins42 wrote 11/27/2015 at 17:06 point

Now that Neil Jansen has quit the project, is it effectively abandoned?

  Are you sure? yes | no

Neil Jansen wrote 11/27/2015 at 18:56 point

A quick glance at the mailing list, linked to on the left-hand side-bar, would indicate no.

  Are you sure? yes | no

bobcousins42 wrote 11/27/2015 at 20:06 point

Cool, Kickstarter next year then?

  Are you sure? yes | no

Consultant wrote 04/30/2016 at 18:43 point

if the answer is no, then what progress has been made in say the last year

  Are you sure? yes | no

Bob Cousins wrote 05/27/2016 at 14:47 point

I guess it is true to say it is not abandoned, there is a small core of developers interested in getting it to work. Maybe one day they will... Tbh, the project was oversold and over-ambitious from the start, it went pretty much the way I expected, too many new things in it.  Even a novel architecture non-linear delta 3d printer for $300 would have been a tough target.

The puzzling thing is that FirePick had a cartesian design before the delta, if they had stuck with that maybe they would have got further. LitePlacer shows what can be done there, but you need a realistic price goal.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Consultant wrote 05/29/2016 at 20:20 point

What's your definition of abandoned?

  Are you sure? yes | no

ahmedrokba wrote 05/25/2016 at 11:24 point

I think the obvious thing to say is PCB are becoming dated.


  Are you sure? yes | no

Mike Maluk wrote 10/23/2015 at 04:38 point

This is amazing, fantastic work!

  Are you sure? yes | no

malvasio.christophe wrote 02/23/2015 at 11:06 point

interesting but pcb use is outdated this days so why don't you work on a more interesting tool that make a circuit in 3d from the components ?

i'm disabled i need a tool that make soldering itself !

(soldering filaments extruder ???)

  Are you sure? yes | no

PointyOintment wrote 02/24/2015 at 23:57 point

Do you have a source for your statement that PCBs are outdated?

  Are you sure? yes | no

lunacyworks wrote 03/14/2016 at 19:07 point

I think the obvious thing to say is PCB are becoming dated.  for example on the RPI instead of using PCB chip based memory they use a CPU with memory chip stacking instead. Samsung and most other IC manufactures are turning to this method.  If we wanted to recreate the RPI  we could only go so far, where if we had the right equipment we could even do our own chipstacking. 

  Are you sure? yes | no

Neil Jansen wrote 02/25/2015 at 02:40 point

PCB use is NOT outdated, regardless of what you've heard.  Who told you that?  The global printed circuit board market was over 60 billion dollars in 2012.  This will increase to 74 billion dollars by 2018.

  Are you sure? yes | no

malvasio.christophe wrote 02/26/2015 at 14:24 point

Neil,Po i assume pcb use is outdated in term of  technology not in market

my comment was about to handle more than the old pcb tech and also about handle soldering

  Are you sure? yes | no

safe wrote 02/04/2015 at 02:24 point

3 d printers, unexpectedly is incredible

  Are you sure? yes | no

ZaidPirwani wrote 11/11/2014 at 17:04 point
Thinking of starting on this project now...

so where do I start...
am actually swarmed by all the links and the data already here..

  Are you sure? yes | no

tom wrote 10/16/2014 at 17:18 point
Congrats on your progress so far, I can't wait to see what's next!

  Are you sure? yes | no

Wire wrote 10/13/2014 at 22:15 point
Do you guys have a twitter account or mailing list that you make announcements on? Want to make sure I don't miss when the kickstarter opens.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Neil Jansen wrote 10/13/2014 at 22:29 point
Sure, we have a developers mailing list, and a beta test signup page at:

  Are you sure? yes | no

Mathieu Stephan wrote 10/13/2014 at 19:03 point
I'm very sorry you didn't make the cut :/

  Are you sure? yes | no

Neil Jansen wrote 10/13/2014 at 22:57 point
Our project is much bigger than the Hackaday Prize. The $200k would have been
sweet, but that's a drop in the bucket compared to where this is going. The
competition was great motivation to get to this point. But now, we've got a
decent size community built around our idea, and that spirit will be what brings
us forward and causes us to do great things. As one of the members on our dev
mailing list just quoted:

“All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is
violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as self-evident.”
― Arthur Schopenhauer

  Are you sure? yes | no

coflynn wrote 10/14/2014 at 12:16 point
Looking forward to the eventual success of this project! Even your consideration of ESD-safe material is definitely showing that this will be a serious P&P machine, compared to some other hacked-together open-source ones. Anyway as a quick note I've seen some mention of solder paste dispensing - if you haven't seen those cheap paste dispenser tools from Aliexpress or similar, it might be an easy way to hack one on as a test. I got one for $100 or so, there's a quick video of it here: . But would be easy to computer-control the paste solenoid in that system... I'm sure you'll come up with something better long-term, but hell for $100 it's hard to beat the zero work it requires ;-)

  Are you sure? yes | no

Neil Jansen wrote 10/15/2014 at 03:53 point
Very cool. I've got a shot dispense system very similar to that, already wired into our machine. But I payed a lot for it years ago. Glad to know there's a cheaper alternative. We will 100% support these air/vacuum powered units, in addition to our cheap printed ones. Thanks for the link!

  Are you sure? yes | no

idrik1 wrote 10/12/2014 at 09:42 point
I hope your project will be production via kickstarter, because he deserves;)

  Are you sure? yes | no

Vincent Pilate wrote 10/10/2014 at 06:20 point
Really Really great work.
Hope you will win your ticket for space.

  Are you sure? yes | no

peter.chen wrote 09/28/2014 at 17:16 point
very cool

  Are you sure? yes | no

James wrote 09/21/2014 at 03:08 point
more updates please!

  Are you sure? yes | no

Neil Jansen wrote 09/23/2014 at 13:22 point
Hi James, we'll have everything up by the September 29th milestone hopefully.. We're a bit behind at the moment, working on BOM and mechanical issues, but we'll have to get everything posted in the next few days if we want to move on to the HaD Contest Finals :)

  Are you sure? yes | no

Albert Huang wrote 09/21/2014 at 00:55 point
Hi there! Just to clarify, this project intends to give the average user the ability to:

1) Print their own PCB board (3D print + print the connections);
2) Pick + place components on the PCB board;
3) Solder these components;
4) 3D print a enclosure of sorts for the project;
5) (Bonus) assemble the enclosure and board together? :D

Just curious as to how far this project will go!

  Are you sure? yes | no

James wrote 09/21/2014 at 03:08 point
I'm pretty sure it can do all that, except the pcb board part. unless you want a chunky plastic board that is made out of conductive plastics ; )

  Are you sure? yes | no

Neil Jansen wrote 09/23/2014 at 13:20 point
Hi Albert, James is correct, we do not print PCB's. There is a company that I saw at NY World Maker Faire, called Cartesian Co., that has a machine that will print working PCB's. I feel that it will take them a few years to perfect it, but they're making low-res double-sided PCB's right now, with plated holes (assuming you have a third machine to drill them). If they open-source one day, there's a chance that we can retrofit their silver inkjet head onto our machine or vice-versa. I also saw the Squink machine (another PCB printer) at NY Maker Faire, but wasn't as impressed with it.

  Are you sure? yes | no

James wrote 10/03/2014 at 05:51 point
hey, by the way, I looked every where for you guys at the maker faire, but couldn't find you. where were you?

  Are you sure? yes | no

Neil Jansen wrote 10/04/2014 at 19:30 point
We were in the 3D printing village, across from ZeGo Robotics. I guess there's always next year. We will be applying for that and probably Bay Area as well.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Dashack wrote 09/01/2014 at 16:28 point
You will create a revolution under 300.00 .ultimately we(self start hackers, cottage industrialists ) want a turn key system at our homes / workbenches. This is a critical link in that chain . The hack space will open out and we will start seeing long term a super explosion of innovation. Great work .

  Are you sure? yes | no

Jasmine Brackett wrote 08/08/2014 at 20:45 point
Hello Neil, Your video looks good, and you've got more than 4 project logs. I couldn't see your system design doc. Maybe you can highlight it in your details? Overall your documentation is great, and we're really pleased you entered. Get in touch if you have any questions.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Neil Jansen wrote 08/11/2014 at 22:37 point
Hi, I've been out of town the last few weeks, but I'm back and will get the system design document done this week hopefully. We've been working on a moving target, so we've left this step off until the last possible minute :) As far as documentation goes, we still have a lot of stuff to add (I'd consider everything up now as more of an introduction to the project). We plan on adding a considerable amount of information to what we have in the forthcoming weeks / months.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Jasmine Brackett wrote 08/11/2014 at 22:41 point
Great stuff. Get as much as you can up before the 20th of August as that's when we will review it for the next round.

  Are you sure? yes | no

Neil Jansen wrote 08/19/2014 at 05:10 point
Jasmine, I added the system design document at:
If you can take a look before the deadline, that would be great. Thanks!

  Are you sure? yes | no

spackl3r wrote 08/02/2014 at 23:50 point
Can't wait to see it work (not to mention a kickstarter campain :)
"Shut up and take my money" meme on standby...

  Are you sure? yes | no

Michael Sampson wrote 07/31/2014 at 04:09 point
Guys this is awesome... It really is. Where do i sign up to buy one!!!!!!!

  Are you sure? yes | no

Neil Jansen wrote 08/01/2014 at 02:13 point
You can sign up here:


  Are you sure? yes | no

Similar Projects

Does this project spark your interest?

Become a member to follow this project and never miss any updates