Close

Does this project spark your interest?

Become a member to follow this project and don't miss any updates

BuckyBot

A Mobile 3D printer to build Megastructures

6.5k 37 64 50

This project was created on 05/06/2014 and last updated 9 days ago.

Description
BuckyBot: A mobile 3D printer to build a 1 Km Dia. dome (yes, that's 1,000 meters)
Details

Hello, I’m Philip Cox. I’ve been an Aerospace Systems Engineer for the last thirty years. I’ve done a lot of things, but I hope that the best is still ahead of me.

I’d like to present to you a concept that’s been cooking in my head for the past few decades. Let’s start with a little background … In R. Buckminster Fuller’s “critical path” he presents and illustration of Manhattan island with a huge geodesic dome covering much of the borough.

Bucky was the inventor (some say ‘popularizer’) of the geodesic dome – he envisioned covering entire cities with vast domes to protect them.  Bucky pointed to a number of reasons why such mega-structures are desirable. He was also quick to point out, however, the difficulties humanity would have building such structures using then-current construction technology. Undeterred, he extrapolated other possibilities of his geodesics.

Fuller realized that geodesic construction might permit one to make structures so large that the volume of air enclosed in them could actually outweigh the materials comprising the structure. If one enclosed heated air, the structure could conceivably become buoyant in the atmosphere – a vast hot-air balloon. I once sat down and calculated just how big one such geodesic dirigibles would have to be – it turns out that a sphere 800 meters or larger is the threshold at which the air inside the structure begins to out weigh the containing structure.

His concept appeared roughly twenty years before George Lucas gave us the floating city of Bespin. 

Fuller had no way to construct such a beast, of course. Which brings me to the sticking point: We can imagine mega-structures on Earth and in space, but we have devoted little or no effort into developing techniques to build them. Human construction technology remains mired in the past. We continue to build using traditional, waddle-and-daub, tinker-toy construction methodologies – only applying new materials as they’ve become available. Imagine the expense in resources required to build a dome over Manhattan one beam at a time... now imagine building a one kilometer sphere in space, one stick at a time, each lifted from Earth. We aren’t going to do it. That doesn’t mean, however, that we can’t build mega-structures. I’ve pondered this question over my entire life. I’ve come to the conclusion that, to build big, we have to think small. . ..

Diatoms and Radiolaria have been making their own geodesic shells for over 500 million years. They secrete silica to form rigid frameworks to armor themselves or increase their apparent surface area for photosynthesis. These microscopic creatures secrete their structure – typically using a simple geometrical initiator, like a circle, triangle, hexagon, or some other simple geometric shape. If you perked up at the mention of an ‘initiator’, you probably suspect, now, where I’m going with this . . . fractals. In short, fractal constructions require an Initiator, a Generator, and a Rule (or Rules) of orientation. Time is too short here for further details of fractals, so, I’ll cut to the chase. The project I’ve been working on for years (mostly as a design exercise) is to create little open-source construction robots – I’ve been calling them BuckyBots – to build mega-structures.

A BuckyBot consists of a small 3D printer in which the print head has up to (maybe) 6 Degrees-of-Freedom. It makes a simple 3-dimensional fractal initiator, such as a tetrahedron, over and over, and over. That’s all it does – ever. It has the ability to climb, like a spider, onto and over the tetrahedrons it has already built to add another course to the structure. We give it simple orientation rules so that it changes its orientation relative to previous “cells”. Eventually, by following simple rules, it will construct a closed shape – like a dome, or a box, or whatever 3-dimensional shape we fancy. It can build any stiffening interior structure as required. ...

Read more »

Components
  • 1 × Arduino Mega To act as master, sends postional data out to all microcontollers over serial comms
  • 1 × Shield Board for Arduino Mega I designed a shield board that adds all the functions for orientation, navigation, communication, and servo driving to one stack
  • 1 × Custom Orientation/Navigation Board (see www.ranarchy.org) Will be posting this schematic and parts list as I get it built. Has GPS, compass, accelerometers...
  • 1 × Vlad's Hexabot Design from GrabCad Have redesigned vertually everything from this design, but it's still basically Vlad's concept of a Hexapod
  • 1 × micro-extruder of pretty much my own design vacuum-jacketted to conserve energy, a real screw-type extruder
  • 1 × FM Modem Using those cheap 433 MHz FSK modems to communicate with the Central Processing Computer
  • 6 × HS-81 servos To support the Bot, and swing the legs
  • 2 × Omega KHLV-0502 Kapton heater for the extruder heating element to turn ABS to putty
  • 6 × F6-14M Thrust Bearings Each Leg needs a thrust Bearing between it and the Spyder Chassis. http://www.astbearings.com/product.html?product=F6-14M
  • 14 × SG-90 micro-servos Two on each leg, they move the legs up and down, and make the foot grip the structure being built. Two are used in the extruder to pitch and roll the extruder nozzle.

See all components

Project logs
  • New video available on youtube

    9 days ago • 0 comments

    In my opinion, it kicks ass... link over in the links list of this page. otherwise:

    http://youtu.be/uCyOZEDgA9U

  • everything moot! It's over...

    12 days ago • 0 comments

    ... and congratulations to the five semifinalists ...

    ... as for BuckyBot, it's on to kickstarter ...

    ... will maintain the project here, however.

  • Kick-Ass Video

    12 days ago • 0 comments

    Well, since I screwed-up posting my "completed" systems design document on Sept. 28, I've decided to run amok, and present a visceral, kick'em-in-the ... uh ... teeth! ... yea, teeth! ... video as a response to the "promotional" video requirement for Oct. 27. It is unclear to me if considered contestants will we "invited" to submit such a video, or if it is a requirement for continued consideration. It should all be over by then, I think.

    Regardless, I'll post it way before then ... maybe this coming weekend. My video editing is limited to Kdenlive and openshot and downloaded pics and vids. "Damnit Jim, I'm an engineer, not a videographer!"

    ... is it just me, or did some of the videos submitted so far look like they spent all their time on the videos rather than their design?

View all 64 project logs

Discussions

Chuck Horner wrote a month ago null point

I work with Randy and I have extensively drilled him about every aspect of this project. He has thought through and solved every issue I brought up. This sounds far out on the surface but the engineering is solid and this process can be achieved. I think there are many applications for this: Swimming pool enclosures(made from clear materials), How much does a sports dome cost to build? How about turning it over to make the worlds largest parabolic antenna? Good luck my friend.

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote a month ago null point

... kind words from Chuck -- software engineer extraordinaire.

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

Garrett Herschleb wrote 2 months ago null point

Once you move past cheap, common 3d printer materials like plastic, it's going to really start paying off in time and complexity to divide the roles of your bots into shape makers, transporters, holders, and fusers.

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote a month ago null point

absolutely right Garrett. We plan to eventually build using stainless steel. There will BuckyBots to skin the structures, Bots to clean/polish surfaces, Bots to repair and maintain ... bot functions will multiply like lemmings.... Check out my blog, where I ramble about the future of BuckyBots and megastructures...

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 2 months ago null point

Somebody call Steven Colbert to get him to ante up $'s and get his face made into a dome over Manhattan ...

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

davedarko wrote 2 months ago null point

there is at least an stl file on thingiverse.com
http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:9104

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

ehughes wrote 2 months ago null point

Congrats on making the cut!

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 2 months ago null point

Thanks, ehughes ... I appreciate the feedback you've given ... please keep it up...

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 2 months ago null point

Everyone, thanks much for your supporting comments. Regardless of how the HackaDay prize turns out, I promise to continue BuckyBot development. It might just be the culmination of my life's work . I have been through the math, and I can't really see anything that stops the show. It will take years before we get to the 1 Km dome, but the concept appears sound. I just need to grind out the hardware/software.

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

davedarko wrote 3 months ago null point

Don't be disappointed by the outcome of the first voting! Your project seems to be very ambiguous and as soon as you will post a video of a crawling 3D printing hexapod it will change. Right now you are setting the first milestones as it seems and this may occur not as far developed as the projects of the top 15 list, so they might be skeptical about it's outcome. Just keep on working on it, find some guys who want to make more out of their hexapods to join you and post updates, videos, pictures, notes, sketches and stuff. I hope you don't feel offended by an arduino-blinky-stuff-developing greenhorn, but you should not look to the left and right but on your project :) I believe in your 3D printing hexapod! Good luck with it!

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 3 months ago null point

I concur ... hope that will be the case. These are all really cool projects, with obviously clever protagonists, but how do they measure up to the stated goals of the contest? Regardless, TheHackadayPrize has spurred me into actually putting BuckyBot theory into practice, which I plan to continue REGARDLESS of the competition outcome.

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 4 months ago null point

I gotta say, I'm kinda dissapointed in the voting so far ... BuckyBot wasn't even listed in the top 15 concepts. I thought the Hackaday Prize was trying to promote culture-changing hacks. It makes me wonder what's wrong with the concept? Just too far a stretch for believability?

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

ehughes wrote 3 months ago null point

I say nothing! I am also a bit disappointed with the number of things that are at the top of the list. I am not sure we another Arduino dev board controlling some leds, etc. As far as the voting, it seemed that the questions they post (Which project most likely to be used in another project) might bias the results. I think questions like these don't represent the best projects for this topic space. I.E. Big/new ideas can sometimes be hard to recognize next to the 100 other project that more of the same.

I honestly think it will work itself out by the time the the official judges get to it.

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

Blecky wrote 2 months ago null point

It's definitely out there, but that's the point right? You were one of the earliest featured projects on hackaday.com so you stood out, that's for sure. I sort of feel the same, but the main point of hacking isn't just to win a competition, it's to share something with the community.

I hope that someone gets something out of every project on this site.

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

iamnotachoice wrote 2 months ago null point

The more non-consensous a concept is, the higher potential it has to become truly culture-changing. And even though hackaday.io surely is about hacking, it's also emerging from a certain culture in it's own consens. So don't be so disappointed, if the masses don't understand it, it's just right! Hope that makes sense, happy hacking!

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

Adam Fabio wrote 4 months ago null point

Thanks for entering The Hackaday Prize! I'm following buckybot closely! Awesome stuff.
Usually I say don't forget to update - but with 26 updates as of this comment, i'd say you're doing pretty darn good :) Keep up the good work, and good luck on your way to SPaaaaaaace!

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

ehughes wrote 4 months ago null point

I really like this "Big" idea. (no pun intended). Good luck!

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 4 months ago null point

Yeah, I saw this before on Hackaday. Not nearly as grandiose concept as the Buckybot, though. The more people we get thinking along these lines, the better for us all, isn't it? Power to them...

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

zakqwy wrote 4 months ago null point

Hi Randy--can you start posting more stuff on this page? I'm having trouble finding my way around your website; for example, the link you posted recently for the schematic PDF doesn't appear to work. Any way you can upload all your files to a Dropbox repo and share 'em that way? Maybe a directory structure like this:

- CAD part and assembly model files
- Gerbers and schematic files
- Firmware/code
- BOM spreadsheets
- Pictures, diagrams, etc

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 4 months ago null point

...will make it all better ... I'll either fix the ranarchy.org pages, or make a dropbox. Believe it or not, I have a work breakdown structure for BuckyBot ... just haven't had time to put it up, yet.

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

zakqwy wrote 4 months ago null point

All good man. Looks like you're making great progress!

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 4 months ago null point

added design document (schematic and gerber files)

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 5 months ago null point

www.ranarchy.org is up now ... creating content for it ...

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 5 months ago null point

There is now a facebook page for the BuckyBot...

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

ebaziuk wrote 6 months ago null point

I'm working on something similar, how do I make contact?

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 6 months ago null point

drop me a line at: coxrandy@knology.net
I am workin on establishing a website dedicated to the project, so, my contact email for BuckyBots will change in a week or two.

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

trev_614 wrote 6 months ago null point

Something like this would have been great for use in containing dust form Chernobyl. I think I read somewhere that they are working on massive steel dome to cover the crumbling reactor building to contain radioactive dust that may be released as the building falls apart.

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 6 months ago null point

Please post your suggestions for uses of structures built by BuckyBot here ... I'm trying to accumulate as many as possible. The hack/make community can think of many more than just my old, decrepit neurons can manage ...

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

Jake wrote 6 months ago null point

This could have some really cool applications in 3rd world countries, for buildings after disasters, disaster protection in the first place, and loads more! Can't wait to see how this turns out:)

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 6 months ago null point

...sorry, that should be tornado....looks like tomato, doesn't it? Imagine a one Km tomato...

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 6 months ago null point

Many reasons to do it. Reduce heat loss, sequester pollutants, protect from weather, reduce solar insolation. dome doesn't have to be solid unless you put a skin on it. Read my description, then read "Critical Path" by R. Buckminster Fuller. Doesn't have to be a dome... could be a big cube (if you're a Borg). Heat produced by city produces draft and forces convection if designed properly. Ask the folks in Oklahoma if they would live under a dome that would withstand an F5 tornato...

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

coxrandy wrote 6 months ago null point

Many reasons to do it. Reduce heat loss, sequester pollutants, protect from weather, reduce solar insolation. dome doesn't have to be solid unless you put a skin on it. Read my description, then read "Critical Path" by R. Buckminster Fuller. Doesn't have to be a dome... could be a big cube (if you're a Borg). Heat produced by city produces draft and forces convection if designed properly. Ask the folks in Oklahoma if they would live under a dome that would withstand an F5 tornato...

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

dave.m.mcdonough wrote 6 months ago null point

Interesting concept, but WHY would you want a dome over the whole city? It seems like a really efficient way to create a dangerously bad air environment.

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

ianlee74 wrote 6 months ago null point

I love this idea!

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

boby828 wrote 6 months ago null point

Sounds pretty awesome! simple solution that can potentially be really useful and hasn't really ever been done, GO FOR IT!

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

Aleksandar Bradic wrote 6 months ago null point

wow! can't wait to see this one :)

Are you sure? [yes] / [no]

Similar projects