Close

Exciting News: Incoming Data!

A project log for DCC Hacking

Reverse-engineering Digital Compact Cassette recorders

Jac GoudsmitJac Goudsmit 02/16/2019 at 08:211 Comment

I fixed a few problems in the Synchronous Serial capturing program that catches the output of the microcontroller in the DCC-175, and behold: this was scrolling up my screen while I was playing my Grace Jones - Island Life prerecorded cassette!

---------- more ----------

Not So Fast!

Okay, there still seems to be a problem where every once in a while it misses a byte. I don't know why this happens, it could be interference. I'm sure my non-shielded wires don't help, and it's possible that, even though output buffers are used for the output lines in the DCC-175 computer connection, they might not generate enough current in some cases to draw the Propeller inputs low or high. Or maybe there's something that I can do about my timing parameters to prevent this.

Try the Veal: Wait, There's a Menu???

The titles of the last two songs on the cassette are clearly visible (and so was the rest of the track list): "9 MY JAMAICAN GUY" "10 SLAVE TO THE RHYTHM" but there's more to see here: "MAIN MENU" "1 ALBUM TITLE" "2 TRACK LIST"...

Those last texts would have totally bewildered me a few years ago. What is this strange information that looks like it's an interactive menu, and why is the DCC-175 sending it to the computer?

The answer is that this is the Interactive Text Transmission Service (ITTS) data that's stored on every prerecorded tape. Prerecorded tapes usually mention this and tell you they contain "DCC-Text" data that can be shown on TV if you have a compatible DCC recorder. No such recorder was ever available to consumers, but Philips made prototype ITTS decoders that could be connected to early DCC recorders to show the information so that mastering facilities could verify that the DCC-Text information showed up as expected.

The ITTS information is formatted according to the ISO-61866 standard. I have a copy of that standard, and it's expensive and big. I can't share the standard here, but as I understand, the way that the data is formatted is similar to CD-Text. I strongly suspect that there are lots of things in the standard that existing prerecorded DCC tapes don't use, but because the recorder basically only acts as a device to pick up the information and spew it out to a decoder, the standard can be any size and there can be any amount of features, and the recorder couldn't care less. Making a decoder for ITTS is probably difficult (and that might be why Philips never went through with it) but that's a whole 'nother story.

Decoding All the Bits

The DCC Museum recently found a PDF online that might help with that. The document is called "Technical Guide Volume 31: Auto DCC Technology" and it pretends to be a service manual for the Panasonic CQ-DC1 car stereo system with DCC mechanism, but contains a HUGE amount of information about the inner workings of DCC, probably copy-and-pasted from the DCC specifications. And it looks like Page 27 has information about how various information such as time codes and song titles are stored in the AUX track. This could be the Rosetta Stone that could help me decode the information that the microcontroller spits out, but I expect that there's more about the data format of the synchronous serial port, since it also gives the computer information about the state of the mechanism (Play, Stop, Wind etc.) and possibly other things.

Lather, Rinse, Repeat

When I look at the myriads of data scrolling by on my terminal screen, there are a few things that stand out:

So Where Am I Going?

The dropped bytes are a potential problem, I should figure out what goes wrong there. Maybe the recorder really is sending fewer bytes sometimes? Is it an electrical problem? Maybe the tape I'm using is too damaged or my heads weren't clean? I should try cleaning the heads and try some other tapes to see if the dropped bytes can be eliminated.

As for the repeating data, I wonder if it would help to detect the L3REF pulse in my Propeller code. That might let me know where the start of the data is, although as mentioned above, DCC timings and numbers don't often play nice.

In order to follow the data from the recorder to the PC as well as the data from the PC to the recorder, I need to run two instances of the sync serial decoder. But the data stream for each line (TX and RX basically) runs at a pretty high speed, and generating a hexdump generates a lot more serial traffic than just sending the bytes in another way. I think if I interleave the transmit data with the receive data, it will make things very confusing very quickly, and I would be practically begging for flow control problem (because there is no flow control) if I would keep doing things in Hex.

So I think it would be better if I send the data out from the Propeller in binary or (slightly more friendly to the eyes) Base64 or something. That way, the stream has a much better chance of arriving intact, and that way I can write a C application under Windows to help me decipher the data. I'm thinking for starters I'll write a console application that hexdumps the data in a much wider format than 80 characters, so that I can get a feeling of where the fields are in the data that gets repeated all the time.

In the next log, I hope I can show some results of my analysis.

Discussions

taper wrote 02/24/2019 at 08:50 point

+1 

:thumbsup:

  Are you sure? yes | no