When I heard about a 1.3m prime focus dish offered for 40€ at a garage sale I couldn't help myself but buy it.
Since I played with the thought of receiving NOAA images on 1.7GHz this antenna seems to fit for that project, although it could be wider. At operation frequency the wavelength is about 180mm which could result in 25dBi gain (which is way better than a quiet long 22 element yagi-uda at about 15dBi). All values are calculated and so will vary in reality.
Stages for this project are:
1 - build rotor
2 - build controller unit (raspberry pi with rtl_tcp server for radio data, rotctld server, motor controller)
3 - build antenna (biquad antenna with an optional amplifier)
4 - testing
Right now I am building the azimuth/elevation rotator rack.
Right now this log only serves as a collection of ideas, here's what I plan as second step:
To control the hardware part, the next step is to build a controller unit.
It will hold a raspberry pi, a RTL-SDR stick, motor driver and software to glue all three together.
RF decoding will be done by a RTL-SDR Stick, radio data will be streamed by a rtl_tcp server running on the pi.
What I want is the controller to accept commands from the hamlib rotctl client. Therefore I'll be writing a python script listening to incoming tcp connections, rotctl_server.py (which will be avilable sometimes later under the file section of this project). This script then will call out via serial terminal to a controller-board (some arduino or PIC controller) which subsequently talks to some A4988 boards. I recently had the fortune working with these A4988's for another project and I like them, so they will be my first choice. They are able to deliver a decent current to stepper motors and allow for microstepping. And they are cheap. The dedicated driver board will support emergency-stop-, position- and end-switches for safety reasons. I don't want to damage the device, me or someone else because I made a mistake in programming.
Currently I'm fiddeling with Mark 3 of the rotor hardware.
At first I tried to drive elevation with a pulley which is way to wobbly so I scrapped it before even trying it out. I( will never use pulleys again if sub degree precision is needed.)
My second approach to elevation control was with a linear motor from a hospital bed. It looks promising.
It was then when I realized that it is a bad idea to rotate everything on a big wooden wheel on cheap wheels for azimuth control (this can be seen on the first image in the gallery) so right now I'm building the third Mark.
It will have a fixed bottom frame, azimuth rotation around a low friction ball bearing and elevation is rotated around another set of ball bearings mounted in a new steel frame.
This is a sketch for Mark 3, most of these parts are ready for assembly.
Once again, more photos will follow soon.
A minor update:
I tried to 3D print gears for el/az control. This turned out very bad, maybe because my 3D printing skills are too low or this process is just not right for this high torque, low speed, high accuracy application.
So.. now I'll order some solid metal gears (pun intended).
The author of this post is clearly an enthusiast in the field of radio technology and antenna building. Their excitement and passion for the project are evident throughout the post. Here are some comments on various aspects of the post:
1. **Excitement and Enthusiasm**: The author's enthusiasm for the project is infectious. The opening statement about purchasing a prime focus dish at a garage sale for a specific price sets the tone for an exciting adventure in antenna construction.
2. **Technical Knowledge**: The post demonstrates a strong understanding of the technical aspects of antennas, frequencies, and gain. The author's calculations about the antenna's potential performance and comparison with a yagi-uda antenna reflect their technical expertise.
3. **Project Phases**: The author has clearly outlined the different stages of their project, which is helpful for readers who might be interested in similar endeavors. This structured approach is a good practice for any technical project.
4. **Controller Unit**: The description of the controller unit shows that the author is planning to integrate various components, including a Raspberry Pi, RTL-SDR stick, and motor driver, to control the antenna. The use of a Python script and the consideration of safety features like emergency-stop and end-switches demonstrate a comprehensive approach to the project.
5. **Rotator**: The author's account of their trials and errors in developing the rotator hardware is relatable for anyone who has engaged in DIY projects. It also shows a willingness to learn and adapt, a valuable quality in any project.
6. **3D Printing**: The brief mention of trying 3D printing for gears and subsequently opting for solid metal gears indicates a pragmatic approach. It's important to acknowledge when a particular approach isn't working and make adjustments accordingly.
7. **Sharing Knowledge**: The author mentions the intention to share their work, particularly the Python script for rotctl_server.py. This is commendable as it contributes to the open-source and maker communities.
In conclusion, this post reflects the excitement, knowledge, and structured approach of the author in their quest to build a high-performance antenna. It's a great example of how enthusiasts share their projects and knowledge with others who share their interests.
The author of this post is clearly an enthusiast in the field of radio technology and antenna building. Their excitement and passion for the project are evident throughout the post. Here are some comments on various aspects of the post:
1. **Excitement and Enthusiasm**: The author's enthusiasm for the project is infectious. The opening statement about purchasing a prime focus dish at a garage sale for a specific price sets the tone for an exciting adventure in antenna construction.
2. **Technical Knowledge**: The post demonstrates a strong understanding of the technical aspects of antennas, frequencies, and gain. The author's calculations about the antenna's potential performance and comparison with a yagi-uda antenna reflect their technical expertise.
3. **Project Phases**: The author has clearly outlined the different stages of their project, which is helpful for readers who might be interested in similar endeavors. This structured approach is a good practice for any technical project.
4. **Controller Unit**: The description of the controller unit shows that the author is planning to integrate various components, including a Raspberry Pi, RTL-SDR stick, and motor driver, to control the antenna. The use of a Python script and the consideration of safety features like emergency-stop and end-switches demonstrate a comprehensive approach to the project.
5. **Rotator**: The author's account of their trials and errors in developing the rotator hardware is relatable for anyone who has engaged in DIY projects. It also shows a willingness to learn and adapt, a valuable quality in any project.
6. **3D Printing**: The brief mention of trying 3D printing for gears and subsequently opting for solid metal gears indicates a pragmatic approach. It's important to acknowledge when a particular approach isn't working and make adjustments accordingly.
7. **Sharing Knowledge**: The author mentions the intention to share their work, particularly the Python script for rotctl_server.py. This is commendable as it contributes to the open-source and maker communities.
In conclusion, this post reflects the excitement, knowledge, and structured approach of the author in their quest to build a high-performance antenna. It's a great example of how enthusiasts share their projects and knowledge with others who share their interests.
https://cursedimages.us/chuck-e-cheese-cursed-image/